On Tuesday 17 November 2009 08:35:24 Ed Loach wrote: > I think there have been > discussions on this list about the ways, and one suggestion (IIRC) > was to add each direction of a route that goes back and forth as > separate relations and make a single relation containing both (can't > remember what the names were, but something like line and route). In > this instance every member of the "line" relation would have > forward/backward next to it, and the reverse "line" would have the > same ways with the opposite forward/backward.
That would be overly complex. The whole idea behind splitting a route into two routes (one for each direction) is that then you no longer need the forward/backward roles. You'd put a "from" and a "to" tag on the whole relation. -- m.v.g., Cartinus _______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
