On 31 July 2010 15:13, Heiko Jacobs <heiko.jac...@gmx.de> wrote: > Michał Borsuk schrieb: > > > I agree with your arguments. Then "former"? > > "former" is a little bit non-specific. > A disused or abandoned railway may also be called "former" > > It's already called "disused" or "abandoned".
> > > I don't like "levelled" for another reason: it is a word that is not >> easily understood for those "English-challenged", that is beginners. It's >> not a word that easily translates into other languages. For this I would >> propose "removed". (Then it does not contrast with "dismantled" very much, >> but frankly I am getting lost in those distinctions). >> > > Better than "levelled" might be the words "converted" or "transformed"? > converted/transformed to farmland/residential areas/village green/... > including filling of cuttings and removing embankments ... > If any traces of it are removed, then it doesn't classify for OSM. -- Best regards, mit freundlichen Grüssen, meilleurs sentiments, Pozdrowienia, Michał Borsuk
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
