On 10/16/2010 06:02 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Paul Johnson > <baloo-PVOPTusIyP/[email protected]> wrote: >>> If bicycle=avoid were a valid tag, I'd use it on roads like this that >>> have unsafe "bike facilities": >> >> There's no such thing as an invalid tag. access=avoid even has a >> proposal in the wiki to convey suitability based on local knowledge of a >> route. Furthermore, intentionally vandalizing someone's work is >> something that I don't think anybody agrees on. Stick to what you know, >> please. > > So would you have no objection to my use of bicycle=avoid on roads > that have bike lanes?
That would be ambiguous in most cases, and I believe you're being obtuse for the sake of being obtuse in this specific instance.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
