On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/16/2010 06:54 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Paul Johnson >> <baloo-PVOPTusIyP/[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 10/16/2010 06:02 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >>>> So would you have no objection to my use of bicycle=avoid on roads >>>> that have bike lanes? >>> >>> That would be ambiguous in most cases, and I believe you're being obtuse >>> for the sake of being obtuse in this specific instance. >> >> I'm talking about the cases that are as objective as a subjective tag >> can be: the lane has identifiable hazards. Often this would be a door >> zone, like the one that killed Dana Laird. Or it could be one like I >> linked above: >> http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/2010/09/23/i-watched-a-guy-get-hit-yesterday/ >> Or it could simply be a sidepath with right-hook danger at every >> driveway. > > OK, I take that back. If cycleway=lane doesn't have the best route, > yes, a bicycle=avoid wouldn't be bad.
cycleway_hazard=door_zone would be better. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
