On 10/16/2010 06:54 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Paul Johnson > <baloo-PVOPTusIyP/sroww+9z...@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> On 10/16/2010 06:02 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: >>> So would you have no objection to my use of bicycle=avoid on roads >>> that have bike lanes? >> >> That would be ambiguous in most cases, and I believe you're being obtuse >> for the sake of being obtuse in this specific instance. > > I'm talking about the cases that are as objective as a subjective tag > can be: the lane has identifiable hazards. Often this would be a door > zone, like the one that killed Dana Laird. Or it could be one like I > linked above: > http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/2010/09/23/i-watched-a-guy-get-hit-yesterday/ > Or it could simply be a sidepath with right-hook danger at every > driveway.
OK, I take that back. If cycleway=lane doesn't have the best route, yes, a bicycle=avoid wouldn't be bad.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
