Is there picture proof of how they are signing it? -James > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:43:47 -0400 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Phil! Gold <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Given that previous list consensus was for tagging of the form: > > > > network=US:I:Future > > ref=<number> > > modifier=Future > > > > and that only one person offered a variant opinion this time around, I'd > > recommend tagging as above. > > > > Also, from your earlier emails, I have future interstates 26, 73, > > 74, and > > 840. Are there any others? > > 86 in New York, so signed for various segments of NY 17. > https://www.dot.ny.gov/regional-offices/multi/i-86 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
