That looks legit enough to qualify IMO for the "US:I:Future" network. Looks like some of the I-74 signs that are posted out there in NC [0]. Still., those signs need to be posted along a segment to qualify for the network. If the signs are the "Future Interstate Corridor" type [1], then that segment would NOT qualify for the "US:I:Future" network as it means there is a slim possibility that alignment might be bypassed. That's happened with several "Future I-74 Corridor" alignments. -James [0] - http://goo.gl/maps/mMIHW [1] - http://www.texasfreeway.com/houston/photos/59sw/59sw.shtml (need to scroll down some) > Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 19:23:52 -0400 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Future Interstate Relations > > On 07/11/2013 01:57 PM, James Mast wrote: > > Is there picture proof of how they are signing it? > > Would http://www.upstatenyroads.com/submit/region-8/Reg8-2.JPG > do? That's in Monroe, New York (and not my picture). > > If my word is no good, will my camera be any better? > I plan to be down that way in another week or so, and > I could probably grab another picture. I can certainly > state that I've seen the sign pictured there. > > -- > 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
