Oh , I thought position 2 was where the physical barrier ended. Must have misinterpreted the image
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Harald Kliems <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:09 AM Marc Gemis <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I thought the "standard" was to put the exit and entrance nodes at the >> place where there is no physical barrier. Continuous white lines >> should be mapped with change:lanes and should have no impact on the >> position of the node. So definitely position "2". >> IMHO This is illustrated by the picture on >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes > > > Please note the footnote on the wiki page though: "There is no physical > separation between the upper two lanes and the lower ones, just a double > solid line. While the editing standards recommend to split the ways only > when a physical separation is present, in many regions the ways are already > splitted in case of a legal separation like a double solid line. In such a > case both resulting ways should be tagged with lanes=2." > > So if we go by what is called the "editing standards," the example that > Horea posted is correct as is, with a split at position 2 being common but > not exactly right because there is no physical barrier. To me that makes > sense, as we also wouldn't map a two-lane road with a double yellow line but > no median as separate ways. > > Harald. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
