No problem, I've updated it and the adjacent frontage roads for how I handle this situation typically (Texas turnarounds and 4-carriageway freeway arrangements are common to frequent in my area).
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Horea Meleg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hy Paul, > > Thanks for your reply. Can you give us an example of how exactly you’re > approaching this, to understand better (some coordinates maybe). > > Also can you please tell us how you think our presented case, should be > processed: > > > > > > > > *From:* Paul Johnson [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Thursday, April 27, 2017 9:04 AM > *To:* Horea Meleg <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Rihards <[email protected]>; Hans De Kryger < > [email protected]>; [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:19 AM, Horea Meleg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hy guys, thanks for your responses. > Do you think that is better to move motorway_junction where continuous > line begins? In real life you can't cross a continuous line, so I think it > should be the same in OSM. What do you think? > > > > Does anybody have objections on me updating that approach with my method? > I tend to start a new lane where the lane taper finishes, start a split at > the start of the theoretical gore (placement=transition on the exit), and > start the ramp centerline at the bullnose. For solid line situations, the > US is a little weird on this. A single solid white line is officially a > "discouraged" movement one should make only with extreme caution, whereas > crossing a double-white line is prohibited, as outlined in the MUTCD. In > either case, I would generally take the conservative approach in this > situation, using something like change:lanes=yes|yes|yes|not_right|no > where that solid line is. >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
