I've been leaving all the TIGER tags and just changing reviewed from no to yes....
The main reason I've been leaving them is I don't know who might want to make use of that information. -jack -- Typos courtesy of fancy auto spell technology On February 13, 2018 5:13:16 AM EST, Mark Wagner <[email protected]> wrote: >On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:25:02 -0800 >OSM Volunteer stevea <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Feb 12, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Tod Fitch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Anyway, what is the current best practice dealing with TIGER tags >> > once the road has been surveyed and corrected? Remove all TIGER >> > tags or just the reviewed tag? >> >> As I am not familiar with the "things you've read," while also >> wondering myself whether additional TIGER tags (tiger:cfcc, >> tiger:zip, etc.) should remain or be deleted, I also pose this >> question to the greater talk-us community. What DO we do with these >> additional TIGER tags as we endeavor to "clean up TIGER" in the USA? >> Is there consensus on a definitive "best practice" for removing or >> leaving them? (Consensus is clear that we remove tiger:reviewed=no >> after we've reviewed the way). >> >> Our wiki https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/TIGER_fixup is silent on this >> particular issue (of removing or leaving additional tags). BTW >> another wiki of ours, https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/TIGER_Edited_Map >> gives a nice overview/documentation of the Ito map. >> >> We might create a new thread or keep it in this one: but even as a >> seasoned TIGER cleanup volunteer, I don't know what to do with >> additional TIGER tags, and I guarantee everybody reading this that >> I'm not alone there! > >I find the "tiger:county" tag to be useful as a quick way to figure out >where I am when looking at a changeset or otherwise am zoomed in on the >map while editing. "tiger:zip" would be useful when adding addresses >if >I could trust it, but it's wrong too often. The rest of the tags >aren't useful because either they can be derived from the OSM-relevant >tags on the road, or they're wrong/outdated. > >-- >Mark > >_______________________________________________ >Talk-us mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
