---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Evin Fairchild <evindf...@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Nov 28, 2018, 6:42 PM Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Trunk versus motorway To: Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org>
I think you're misrepresenting the discussion. People are simply saying that the motorway destination should extend all the way to the first at grade intersection, rather than the interchange prior to the at grade intersection. Personally, I agree with this. The only exception would be if there's an at grade intersection sandwiched between two interchanges. In that case there should be a stretch of trunk in between the two interchanges. Further, I strongly disagree with the way the Tisdale was originally tagged, (the entire thing, even the obvious freeway sections were originally trunk) because if we followed Paul's logic everywhere, most odd numbered 3 digit interstates would have to be tagged as trunk. Frankly, I've wanted to change this road from trunk to motorway in the past, but I've avoided doing so because this is Paul's home turf and I felt I'd just be shaking a hornet's nest. -Evin (compdude) On Wed, Nov 28, 2018, 6:19 PM Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: > Can I get some voice of reason in > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64919426? There seems to be > quite a few people (and one AARoads forum troll egging it on) that are > trying to propel the idea that motorways have at-grade intersections, which > is obviously incorrect. > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
