Ah, thanks for the explanation Evan. You may be correct, especially since
Teksavy is still supporting analogue services in general.
As for what bell is violating, because phone service falls under cRTC
rules, its those rules they are violating. still, if I am forthright, I
would rather a solid solution, not a long drawn out fight. I use the phone
for work, with complaining not very financially rewarding smiles.
Kare
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 4:00???PM Karen Lewellen via talk <[email protected]>
wrote:
Evan, I did not get your post, but will go back and hunt my inbox.
Is your suggestion that techsavvy might have an emulator that might be
more friendly to my equipment?
Not quite. I was saying that Teksavvy uses different in-home router
equipment than Bell and it might be friendlier to your analog phone.
Having said that, I agree with Hugh that it should be Bell's problem and
task to ensure that you're able to use your phone on their equipment.
Rendering your existing phone non-functional on its new installation may be
in violation of AODA.
- Evan
---
Post to this mailing list [email protected]
Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
