Also 6 GB can be used as well.

-----Original Message-----
From: Talk [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 3:52 PM
To: Michael Capelle; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: we 9.2, very unresponsive

I'm very glad I got 8 gigs of ram when I put this computer together many
years ago.  For the most part, Window-eyes runs flawlessly under windows
7 64-bit.  I do notice that there are some websites that simply lock
Window-eyes up, causing a reboot of the system.  This is the first version
of this new way of displaying webpages, so i'm hoping that in the next
version of Window-eyes, some of those issues can be resolved.  
I notice that it particularly has trouble with sites that have a lot of
flash content and large webpages with lots of links seem to choke it up.
Smaller sites like google work just fine. So if any AI squared staff need
any examples, i'd be really glad to help to resolve some of these things.
I'd like to see the next version load web pages even faster than this one
does, if that's possible.






On 11/25/2015 4:29 PM, Michael Capelle via Talk wrote:
> 4 gb of ram is a very minimum basic configuration.  I usually 
> recommend at least 8 gb of ram or higher.
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Pamela Dominguez via Talk
> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 3:25 PM
> To: [email protected] ; Jed Barton ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: we 9.2, very unresponsive
>
> Part of your problem could be the amount of ram you have.  On a modern 
> computer, I don't know that four gigs is much ram.  If I'm wrong, I'm 
> sure somebody will tell me.  Pam.
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Jed Barton via Talk
> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 12:32 PM
> To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: we 9.2, very unresponsive
>
> Hey guys,
> Alright, before i throw this computer out the window, i need some 
> honest feedback.  I am running we 9.2, a win 7 machine with 4 gigs of 
> ram.  I just upgraded to we 9.2, and to say i am disappointed is a big 
> under-statement.  This is by far the slowest version of we i have ever 
> used.  Guys at aisquared, i do not mean this in a bad way, but i 
> really need some insight here.  I'm just being bluntly honest.  On the 
> web, it's horrible.  I can press the up and down arrow keys, and 
> literally count seconds before it responds.  I find that it's just 
> being very slow.  I am assuming, that because of the new thing they 
> did with changing web pages, that this old machine just can't handle it.
> I am planning on getting a new machine with windows 10, a solid state 
> drive, and 8 gigs of ram.  Please guys, i need some input here.  I 
> fully expected it would be a lot more responsive than this.  I am 
> really thinking of doing a system restore at this point.
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Jed
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>
> For membership options, visit
>
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/geodom%40opton
line.net. 
>
> For subscription options, visit
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>
> For membership options, visit
>
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/mcapelle%40cha
rter.net.
> For subscription options, visit
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>
> For membership options, visit
>
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/rascal0826%40v
erizon.net.
> For subscription options, visit
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>

_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/skyt%40shaw.ca
.
For subscription options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to