Hi, I have no issues with Window-Eyes on any of my computers running 4 Gb of ram. Maybe see what is hogging up processes that are running in the background.
Portia. > On Nov 25, 2015, at 3:51 PM, Chris Skarstad via Talk > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm very glad I got 8 gigs of ram when I put this computer together many > years ago. For the most part, Window-eyes runs flawlessly under windows 7 > 64-bit. I do notice that there are some websites that simply lock > Window-eyes up, causing a reboot of the system. This is the first version of > this new way of displaying webpages, so i'm hoping that in the next version > of Window-eyes, some of those issues can be resolved. I notice that it > particularly has trouble with sites that have a lot of flash content and > large webpages with lots of links seem to choke it up. Smaller sites like > google work just fine. So if any AI squared staff need any examples, i'd be > really glad to help to resolve some of these things. I'd like to see the > next version load web pages even faster than this one does, if that's > possible. > > > > > > > On 11/25/2015 4:29 PM, Michael Capelle via Talk wrote: >> 4 gb of ram is a very minimum basic configuration. I usually recommend at >> least 8 gb of ram or higher. >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Pamela Dominguez via Talk >> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 3:25 PM >> To: [email protected] ; Jed Barton ; Window-Eyes Discussion List >> Subject: Re: we 9.2, very unresponsive >> >> Part of your problem could be the amount of ram you have. On a modern >> computer, I don't know that four gigs is much ram. If I'm wrong, I'm sure >> somebody will tell me. Pam. >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Jed Barton via Talk >> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 12:32 PM >> To: Window-Eyes Discussion List >> Subject: we 9.2, very unresponsive >> >> Hey guys, >> Alright, before i throw this computer out the window, i need some honest >> feedback. I am running we 9.2, a win 7 machine with 4 gigs of ram. I >> just upgraded to we 9.2, and to say i am disappointed is a big >> under-statement. This is by far the slowest version of we i have ever >> used. Guys at aisquared, i do not mean this in a bad way, but i really >> need some insight here. I'm just being bluntly honest. On the web, >> it's horrible. I can press the up and down arrow keys, and literally >> count seconds before it responds. I find that it's just being very >> slow. I am assuming, that because of the new thing they did with >> changing web pages, that this old machine just can't handle it. >> I am planning on getting a new machine with windows 10, a solid state >> drive, and 8 gigs of ram. Please guys, i need some input here. I fully >> expected it would be a lot more responsive than this. I am really >> thinking of doing a system restore at this point. >> Any thoughts? >> >> Thanks, >> Jed >> _______________________________________________ >> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author >> and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. >> >> For membership options, visit >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/geodom%40optonline.net. >> >> For subscription options, visit >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >> List archives can be found at >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author >> and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. >> >> For membership options, visit >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/mcapelle%40charter.net. >> For subscription options, visit >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >> List archives can be found at >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author >> and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. >> >> For membership options, visit >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/rascal0826%40verizon.net >> >> <http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/rascal0826%40verizon.net>. >> For subscription options, visit >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >> <http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com> >> List archives can be found at >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >> <http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author > and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. > > For membership options, visit > http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/portia89%40sbcglobal.net > > <http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/portia89%40sbcglobal.net>. > For subscription options, visit > http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com > <http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com> > List archives can be found at > http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com > <http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com> _______________________________________________ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
