4 gb of ram is a very minimum basic configuration. I usually recommend at least 8 gb of ram or higher.

-----Original Message----- From: Pamela Dominguez via Talk
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 3:25 PM
To: [email protected] ; Jed Barton ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: we 9.2, very unresponsive

Part of your problem could be the amount of ram you have.  On a modern
computer, I don't know that four gigs is much ram.  If I'm wrong, I'm sure
somebody will tell me.  Pam.

-----Original Message----- From: Jed Barton via Talk
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 12:32 PM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: we 9.2, very unresponsive

Hey guys,
Alright, before i throw this computer out the window, i need some honest
feedback.  I am running we 9.2, a win 7 machine with 4 gigs of ram.  I
just upgraded to we 9.2, and to say i am disappointed is a big
under-statement.  This is by far the slowest version of we i have ever
used.  Guys at aisquared, i do not mean this in a bad way, but i really
need some insight here.  I'm just being bluntly honest.  On the web,
it's horrible.  I can press the up and down arrow keys, and literally
count seconds before it responds.  I find that it's just being very
slow.  I am assuming, that because of the new thing they did with
changing web pages, that this old machine just can't handle it.
I am planning on getting a new machine with windows 10, a solid state
drive, and 8 gigs of ram.  Please guys, i need some input here.  I fully
expected it would be a lot more responsive than this.  I am really
thinking of doing a system restore at this point.
Any thoughts?

Thanks,
Jed
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/geodom%40optonline.net.
For subscription options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/mcapelle%40charter.net. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to