On 5 Mar 2009, at 03:35, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > Andy Allan wrote: >> 1) Make the plan and the draft public. Ask for feedback. >> 2) Wait for feedback to be taken into account and expect/hope for a >> final version of the ODbL >> 3) See if the OSMF board approves >> 4) See if OSMF members like what results > > The word "final" should probably be struck out here because it has > kind > of "gun to your head" ring to it: Take this license or be stuck with > CC-BY-SA forever.
Agreed, I don't think that's the intention. > Instead, if either the OSMF board, or the members, are unhappy with > the > license (which is quite likely given that only ONE week is scheduled > for > phase 2 and I can safely say that the status quo would not pass a > vote), > then we need a new iteration; what is your "final" version then > becomes > the draft, and back to phase 1. Lets expand it from one week then? > And this must be made clear when the vote is taken; that this is not a > vote about "ODbL now or CC-BY-SA forever" but a vote about "ODbL or > wait > for revisions". Right... but we should quantify what the cost/benefit of that will be. Best Steve _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk