Frederik Ramm schrieb: > Hi, > > Mario Salvini wrote: >> Even in germany on these roads there are no additional rights-of-way >> in comparison to "normal" cycleways (except that bicycles get the >> officially allowance to drive next to each other and not just inline. >> buts that's piece of cake ;) ). A normal cycleway with >> motorcar/agricultural/...=yes/destination/... would be exactly the same. > > We're getting very much into national detail here but just to give an > example, look at this aerial image (which is 100 metres from my office > BTW): > > http://maps.google.de/maps?ll=49.007912,8.378746&spn=0.000729,0.001026&t=h&z=20 > > > > The road going east-west is a former residential road with different > lanes for each direction of travel, plus diagonal parking spaces in the > middle. It is over 20 metres wide. This road has now been designated a > "Fahrradstrasse" (cycle road). Motorized traffic is still allowed at > "adequate speeds" (whatever that means). > > While I am not a big fan of endless tagging discussions, tagging the > road above as "highway=cycleway, car=yes" strikes me as grossly > misleading. > > Maybe it should simply retain highway=residential. After all, the > "residentialness" of the road has not changed one bit since it was > designated a cycle road. > > Bye > Frederik tag both ways as: highway=cycleway motor_vehicle=yes footway=right parking:right=inline parrking:left=diagonal width=13
the rest you don't like is just a rendering issue but not about data, I think. Best regards Mario _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
