Shaun McDonald schrieb: > > On 10 Jun 2009, at 03:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> 2009/6/9 Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org>: >>> I'm curious if bicycle boulevards would qualify as living streets, >>> given >>> that a living street would most closely describe a bicycle boulevard in >>> OSM terms, though a bicycle boulevard might lack pedestrian facilities. >>> Frequently, these are not streets you would want to let the kids play >>> in, as the volume of fast-moving, near-silent vehicles would present a >>> very real collision hazard at peak traffic times. This kind of way has >>> sprung up only in the last 10 years or so, and almost all of them were >>> formerly highway=residential prior to becoming bicycle boulevards. >> >> I would still like to see the cycleroad-proposal become reality, >> because these kind of streets IMHO merit their own class. >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/cycleroad >> > > In my eyes, that road would be simply tagged with highway=cycleway. > > Shaun +1 for me. Even in germany on these roads there are no additional rights-of-way in comparison to "normal" cycleways (except that bicycles get the officially allowance to drive next to each other and not just inline. buts that's piece of cake ;) ). A normal cycleway with motorcar/agricultural/...=yes/destination/... would be exactly the same.
Regards Mario _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk