(highway=cycleway +)
cycleway=cyclestreet could also be a good solution (next to lane and 
[additional] track)

--
 Mario

Richard Mann schrieb:
> I think "designation" is about the legal status of a way, particularly 
> where that might not be obvious from, or in conflict with the physical 
> characteristics of the way.
>  
> On physical characteristics, you can get a fair way with 
> highway=residential + maxspeed=(say)30. There wouldn't be too many 
> people misled by that. Maybe add motorcar=destination to emphasise the 
> point for routers. We have a tag for special features for cyclists, so 
> I'd use that to be a bit more precise: cycleway=cyclestreet.
>  
> Is that precise enough - probably. Only a complete absolutist would 
> want to add a designation tag to emphasise that this really is a bona 
> fide properly-signposted official got-the-tshirt Fahrradstrasse. In 
> which case add designation=official (or designation=cyclestreet, if 
> that's a locally-agreed value)
>  
> Richard
>  
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Frederik Ramm <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     2009/6/10 Mario Salvini <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>     > tag both ways as:
>     > highway=cycleway
>     > motor_vehicle=yes
>     > footway=right
>     > parking:right=inline
>     > parrking:left=diagonal
>     > width=13
>
>     I won't have it. This feature is a road, not a 20 metre wide cycleway
>     with parking facilities.
>
>     Yes there are different aims that people have in mind when they think
>     about our data, and to someone who only cares about routing for
>     motorized vehicles, this road might actually come close to a "cycleway
>     with cars allowed", but if I'd tell any of the residents there
>     that they
>     live on a cycleway they'll either laugh or be offended.
>
>     Bye
>     Frederik
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     talk mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>   


_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to