I think "designation" is about the legal status of a way, particularly where that might not be obvious from, or in conflict with the physical characteristics of the way.
On physical characteristics, you can get a fair way with highway=residential + maxspeed=(say)30. There wouldn't be too many people misled by that. Maybe add motorcar=destination to emphasise the point for routers. We have a tag for special features for cyclists, so I'd use that to be a bit more precise: cycleway=cyclestreet. Is that precise enough - probably. Only a complete absolutist would want to add a designation tag to emphasise that this really is a bona fide properly-signposted official got-the-tshirt Fahrradstrasse. In which case add designation=official (or designation=cyclestreet, if that's a locally-agreed value) Richard On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > Hi, > > 2009/6/10 Mario Salvini <salv...@t-online.de>: > > tag both ways as: > > highway=cycleway > > motor_vehicle=yes > > footway=right > > parking:right=inline > > parrking:left=diagonal > > width=13 > > I won't have it. This feature is a road, not a 20 metre wide cycleway > with parking facilities. > > Yes there are different aims that people have in mind when they think > about our data, and to someone who only cares about routing for > motorized vehicles, this road might actually come close to a "cycleway > with cars allowed", but if I'd tell any of the residents there that they > live on a cycleway they'll either laugh or be offended. > > Bye > Frederik > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
