On 11 Aug 2009, at 18:01, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Shaun McDonald wrote:oneway=yes isn't a good idea, as oneway is generally assumed to / not/ affect pedestrians. (Or how many of you actually add an exception forpedestrians when mapping a highway with oneway=yes?)The exception being highways that are for pedestrians, i.e. footway andpedestrian.That exception isn't documented anywhere, really rare and as such unlikely to be included with all applications. It might make sense to you as a human, but what's the general rule that would describe the desired behaviour? For example: Would oneway apply to pedestrians ifused on highway=path? Would this depend on the access tags used togetherwith it?
It hasn't been documented yet because noone has been mapping to that level of detail yet.
I'd therefore use something like foot[backward]=no (or whatever syntaxfor conditional tagging is your personal favourite) on that footway leading through the turnstile.That's an uggly looking tag.That sort of tag or anything equivalently expressive is required to represent some situations. I'm not proposing it specifically as a solution for this case. However, as a general solution for conditionaltagging (depending on direction, vehicle, time, etc.) is needed anyway,it can be used to solve this as well.
oneway:foot=yes is what I would use in that case as it would follow the same pattern as several other tags.
Shaun
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
