2009/8/11 Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de>: > Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >>> I'd therefore use something like foot[backward]=no (or whatever syntax >>> for conditional tagging is your personal favourite) on that footway >>> leading through the turnstile. >> >> does this imply to split the way on the stile? Do you split it on >> either side? > > This can be applied to any way as long as that way needs to be used when > passing the stile. The stile should be a node on that way, but whether > it is the first/last node or any node inbetween doesn't matter at all.
I see this differently as the restriction does not apply to the whole footway but just to the part crossing the style. If the footway is some kilometres in length, why would you want to map it as oneway for all this part? IMHO you have to split the way after ~50cm after the stile (width of the stile) and not to start before your inside the stile (otherwise you will get "trapped" inside a normal footway (for routers) not beeing able to return if e.g. the stile is closed. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
