On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Roy Wallace <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a couple of thoughts: > > 1) Re: connecting paths across small grass areas - don't mark a path > where there isn't one, and especially don't do it for the purpose of > trying to make routers work better. Map reality - that will always > work best in the long term. (just my personal preference)
When is there a path and when is there not a path? I walk through an area of grass every time I go to the park near my house. Isn't that a "path" which is part of "reality"? > 3) Re: what does <TAG> really mean? - rather than everyone giving > their personal opinion on e.g. what highway=path means, for new users > I would strongly recommend reading the wiki carefully and using that. "A generic path, either multi-use, or unspecified usage." Umm, okay. I take that to mean anything course of travel that isn't covered by one of the other highway tags. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
