On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > According to the wiki, associatedStreet only allows one occurrence of > the street role,
Which is the main difference with the proposal 'street'. But this can be changed. It doesn't disturb existing relations and again, we could deprecate the relation 'street' (the other member is 'everything that belongs to a street' which sounds like the dirty "is_in"). > and that member has to be a way. So should we allow > associatedStreet include a street relation under the street role, or > should we allow it to contain multiple ways? Given the name, probably the > former. > because the name is singular ? is it a good reason to use relations of relations when we know how difficult it is to edit ? Pieren
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
