On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: >> >> According to the wiki, associatedStreet only allows one occurrence of >> the street role, > > Which is the main difference with the proposal 'street'. But this can be > changed.
But changing it is probably a bad idea. Do we really want a relation with 500 ways representing the street and 50,000 nodes representing the buildings? After rereading http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories I'm going to conclude that the proper place to put address information is in the building data, not in the street data, and that associatedStreet should therefore be deprecated. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
