Hi, On 12/17/10 09:43, David Paleino wrote:
today I've stumbled upon changeset 6682943 [0] in my area, and, digging further, I found its companions listed in [1].
Imports on such scale should be discussed before they're done, and documented after. In this case, a discussion would probably have yielded the recommendation to automatically detect duplicates.
Complete lack of discussion is reason enough for a revert in my opinion. I'd suggest contacting the importer and asking him where/how he has heard the community about his plans and whether he intends to fix the problems.
Bye Frederik _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
