On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Andrew Harvey wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Come on, this is non-sense. If someone accepted the CT and imports the >>> data, >>> it should be enough. >> >> I disagree, if there is reasonable evidence or suspicion that the data >> may have licensing problems then we should ask the source of that data >> for more details. If it turns out that the PD data really has been >> traced from say a Google Map, then at least under OSM policy that data >> cannot be uploaded to the database, hence we must remove that data. > > Someone is innocent until proven guilty. >
Yes, which is why I said we should ask the user for more information about that data if there is some evidence to suggest it may be from a non-compatible source. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
