Le 17/12/2010 11:34, Stefan de Konink a écrit :
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Andrew Harvey wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Stefan de Konink <[email protected]>
wrote:
Come on, this is non-sense. If someone accepted the CT and imports
the data,
it should be enough.
I disagree, if there is reasonable evidence or suspicion that the data
may have licensing problems then we should ask the source of that data
for more details. If it turns out that the PD data really has been
traced from say a Google Map, then at least under OSM policy that data
cannot be uploaded to the database, hence we must remove that data.
Someone is innocent until proven guilty.
It is note a question of someone's guilty. I hope people hare of good
faith. People can be wrong with good faith.
But a question of data and certainty of compatible licence.
--
FrViPofm
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
