On Friday 17 December 2010, Stefan de Konink wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Come on, this is non-sense. If someone accepted the CT and imports the > >> data, > >> it should be enough. > > > > I disagree, if there is reasonable evidence or suspicion that the data > > may have licensing problems then we should ask the source of that data > > for more details. If it turns out that the PD data really has been > > traced from say a Google Map, then at least under OSM policy that data > > cannot be uploaded to the database, hence we must remove that data. > > Someone is innocent until proven guilty.
We are not a legal system. We are a project with funds that won't stretch very far when it comes to legal fees. robert. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
