>>>> The >>>> license doesn't even mention "data", and attribution is not enough. >>> >>> OSM applies the license to data - the license attribution it requests >>> specifically mentions "Map data". >> >> Again, who wrote the license attribution request? Not me. In fact, >> I'm not even sure what license attribution request you're talking >> about. If you mean the one in the slippy map, I consider that to be >> incorrect. The entire work must be CC-BY-SA, not just the data. >> > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright - if you think it's incorrect, you > should probably take that up with the OSMF, which is the publisher of > www.openstreetmap.org (so one can assume that the website represents the > OSMF's view).
OSMF is entitled to any view it wants. But OSMF does not own the OSM database. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
