On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Graham Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree, it sounds mad, and I find it hard to believe that 'we' would do > this. Surely we need to apply a bit of pragmatism to this and think about > 'reasonableness'? > > I can see that it is reasonable to delete the contributions from someone who > has explicitly said that they do not agree to the new terms - that is a > shame, but it is their choice. > > From the discussion on this list (and I have not looked into it properly - I > gave up on thinking about licences when the 'debate' all got out of hand > earlier in the year), it sounds as though if someone who has neither > accepted nor declined the terms has touched an object, that object will be > deleted - is this really the intention of those looking after this licence > change? "Touched" no. "Created" yes. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/What_is_clean%3F _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
