On 13 December 2011 22:30, Nathan Edgars II <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/13/2011 4:25 PM, john whelan wrote: >> >> The intentions don't matter here, its to be able to defend the new >> licensing / copyright in court you need to show all the content has come >> from people who have accepted the new license. > > > Which is impossible because of the common practice of copying tags from a > node to a building polygon.
It is possible but not in an automated manner. With some very clever automated heuristics it might be close to correct. But certainly not only by looking at the history of each object individually. This is one reason the current ODbL-status tools are of little value. The second reason I see is that they look at CT-acceptance, which as it stands is orthogonal to ODbL-compatibility. Both of these things are present in OSM now: * data incompatible with ODbL but compatible with the current licensing terms, allowed to be contributed under CT and * data which available under ODbL (such as my contributions) contributed by mappers who decline the current version of CT. Cheers _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
