Am 15.12.2011 16:33, schrieb Ed Avis:
... They did not compare the new CTs with the terms the project had before, which essentially said that you agree to license under CC-BY-SA, and which might be equally effective at addressing the joint work problem if it exists. We do not yet know.
Something that I've pointed out before: the wording in the pre CT 1.0 "contributor terms" was very fuzzy, in particular it -did- not clearly state that you were licensing the data to "the operator of the website" on CC-by-SA 2.0 terms, it could just as good be interpreted as giving "the operator of the website" permission to license and distribute the data on CC-by-SA 2.0 terms, leaving the internal contractual and licence relationship open.
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms/History
Simon _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
