Am 13.12.2011 23:24, schrieb 80n: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org > <mailto:frede...@remote.org>> wrote: > > >> It is important to note that the OSM Inspector view is not the final >> word - not even an "official word" - on the question of what gets >> deleted. It is just my interpretation of the current situation. > > Frederik, If the OSM Inspector view is just your own interpretation of > the current situation then this is surely problematic. > > Contributors may be reassured by OSM Inspector that a path is safe and > that it can be edited. It may then later get deleted. Who gets to make > the official decision about what is safe and what is not? And when does > that decision get made?
OK, I'll bite. I would trust Frederik that if any official decision is made the view will reflect that. Frederik has updated the rules for the Inspector from time to time, and I have no reason to believe he will not keep the ruleset current as the legal situation on corner cases becomes clearer. -- Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie Bremen - 53.0901°N 8.7868°E
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk