2011/12/21 Dirk-Lüder Kreie <[email protected]>: > Am 13.12.2011 23:24, schrieb 80n: >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Frederik Ramm <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >>> It is important to note that the OSM Inspector view is not the final >>> word - not even an "official word" - on the question of what gets >>> deleted. It is just my interpretation of the current situation. >> >> Frederik, If the OSM Inspector view is just your own interpretation of >> the current situation then this is surely problematic. >> >> Contributors may be reassured by OSM Inspector that a path is safe and >> that it can be edited. It may then later get deleted. Who gets to make >> the official decision about what is safe and what is not? And when does >> that decision get made? > > OK, I'll bite. > > I would trust Frederik that if any official decision is made the view > will reflect that. Frederik has updated the rules for the Inspector from > time to time, and I have no reason to believe he will not keep the > ruleset current as the legal situation on corner cases becomes clearer. > I have no doubt about Frederik's integrity in this matter, but that wasn't the question.
The questions were: Who gets to make those decisions? When do those decisions get made? Until those questions are answered the information presented by OSM Inspector may be counter-productive. Misguiding users with both false positives and false negatives. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
