Graham Jones wrote "*I completely agree - we should assume that no response is equivalent to *consent - if they complain about this action we can delete their data when they show enough interest to actually decline the licence/terms. Qui tacet consentire"
There is one problem with this. There are people who are remaining "undecided" so that remappers will leave their work alone in the vain hope that the undecider votes in our favour. Then at the last moment they will decline, thus ensuring maximum damage to the OSM database on April 1st. So, If we decide to now accept an undeciders work then remappers will surely leave it alone and then when the undecider turns into a decliner on or after the changeover date, then they will have succedded in damaging our database. Therefore if we decide to auto-accept an undeciders work, this decision must be irreversible and must be taken soon (within the week). Otherwise we should remap the undeciders roads as fast as possible. I guess (IANAL) that maybe if we do take over the undeciders work and they complain, then we could remove that data at OUR liesure by remapping it one way at a time,over the next year or so.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
