On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Tom MacWright <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ever since 2012, in the second commit ever, "Not breaking other people's > data" has been one of the three clearly stated public design goals of iD. > This goal does not appear to have been carried out. The iD project comes off as tone deaf to breaking data concerns: Look at the uproar over issues of "breaking data". Look at the core team response, which is mostly defensive posturing, not oriented to solutions. Why has iD taken such a beating on the mailing list "breaking data" issues? I don't think it's just anti-iD bias.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
