Hi, Am 2015-02-11 um 17:25 schrieb Tom MacWright: >> Unfortunately, experience suggests that there's relatively little that a >> discussion on on the "talk" mailing list is going to be able to do here. > > > This. Help with development or give productive feedback on the issue > tracker. FUD around editors has been discussed to death and it's clear that > writing more emails won't do anything.
The relation issue has been reported almost two years ago. https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/1461 This fact makes me to suggest everyone, every newbie, not to use iD. https://lists.openstreetmap.de/pipermail/stuttgart/2015-February/000526.html (in German) From my point of view, there is huge difference in opinion between iD developers and the mappers who clean up after an iD mapper has damaged something. There are some cases where the "Don't confuse the user by popup warnings" (it seems that this is the development goal of iD) does not work. Relations are an example. https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/blob/master/README.md says: > It lets you do the most basic tasks while not breaking other people's > data. I can just laugh out loudly. Best regards Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
