On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Tom MacWright <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Unfortunately, experience suggests that there's relatively little that a >>> discussion on on the "talk" mailing list is going to be able to do here. >>> Help >>> with development or give productive feedback on the issue tracker. >> >> > Productive feedback on the iD issue tracker follows a similar trajectory > to that on the talk list. It's not really working there either. > There seem to be fairly deep seated differences in the philosophy of > on-boarding new mappers, and those reflect themselves in iD's user > interface. Since iD was awarded prime spot on osm, and since it's > development is tightly held, everyone else is left with no outlet other > than to complain. > > OSM is a very open project in general, but iD's development is very > tightly held and opinionated. > That is very far from the truth. 77 people have contributed to iD [0]. The code is pretty darn easy to understand and is constructed in a pretty approachable way. It's well-documented and specific questions are answered quickly. If you have something valuable to contribute, iD is one of the best places to put your time in the OSM world. [0] https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/graphs/contributors
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
