On 30/05/2015, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > there are ~600 visible_name
On Overpass there's actually only two places where "visible_name" has been used: * In Venice, associated with a corresponding name=*, looks completely superfluous. * Somewhere else in Italy, associated with noname=yes and a note on why the signposted name isn't a proper one. In both cases, it doesn't look like a take that routers and renderers would want to take into account. > 37000 unsigned_ref And 30000 of those are associated with a ref=*. Not sure how this is supposed to be used, it seems like a poorly-designed tag to me. Is that inherited from TIGER ? > 518 unsigned > 400 signed > 161 name:signed > 124 name:sign > 86 ref:signed > 48 unsigned_name > 47 ref:unsigned > 16 name:signposted Yup, founds those too after Simon explained things a bit. > It seems that for names nobody cares to say whether they are signposted or > not (or maybe only when the sign is different from the actual name), while > for ref it seems common practice(?) to use unsigned_ref I wouldn't trust or interpret unsigned_ref until I understand a bit more about it. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
