That lengthy discussion mentions that contrast is not high enough with
surrounding forest. The question is Should we modify lake or forest color?
In forestry areas like north of Norway and Canada, it is difficult to find
features unless you know where they are and zoom-in enough. I have edited a lot
in north of Quebec, Canada and often observe this.
A better color balance would be obtained betwee lakes and forests, plus it
would be easier to spot features and text if the forest color was lighter and
the forest icons were less predominant.
North of Canada, forests and lakes are predominant. These are large areas where
it is difficult to spot features. We need a balance with both lakes, forests
and other features.
Pierre
De : Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl>
À : [email protected]
Envoyé le : jeudi 22 Septembre 2016 11h14
Objet : [OSM-talk] Planned water color change on osm-carto
Hi,
I want to change the water color on default OSM map layer (osm-carto
style) and wile the code itself is very simple:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/compare/master...kocio-pl:water
the water is so important map feature, that I want to test it as wide as
possible. So if you know some places where there's a water problem
currently or which is perfect now and you are worry that it can be
worse, drop a line with URL, so I can test it. I want to focus on water
color to avoid solving too many problems at once and hit the rendering
servers one day, but other water related issues may be discussed
separately.
You can also look at a lengthy discussion about water color here:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1781
--
"To co ludzie zwą marskością wątroby/ Tak naprawdę jest śmiercią z
tęsknoty" [Afro Kolektyw]
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
