All what is written at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aviation is fair enough, especially the main principle: "We map anything that is observable on the ground.", but not an airspace. A communication tower, or a mast is well observable on the ground.

The DJI changed the map on its RPAS control stations from Google to Here Map. And on Here Map not much is shown. So usually one looks at several maps while planning a flight, especially in an urban area.

Best regards,
Oleksiy

On 23.04.17 10:47, Andreas Vilén wrote:
Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aviation

Pilots do not use the osm base map...

/Andreas

Skickat från min iPhone

23 apr. 2017 kl. 07:50 skrev Oleksiy Muzalyev <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:

On 22.04.17 21:17, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:

sent from a phone

On 22. Apr 2017, at 08:33, Oleksiy Muzalyev <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

In my opinion, it is a significant issue, in fact a disaster waiting to happen. There will be soon air-born taxi in Dubai, Singapore, etc., and the extremely high communication towers, the so-called aviation traffic obstacles https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_traffic_obstacle , are not rendered on the OSM map at all.

which disaster do you expect to happen? Someone flying around in dense fog and using no other information than osm-carto?

I agree it is a shortcoming that towers are not rendered on osm-carto, but we should keep calm and not exaggerate its significance.

cheers,
Martin

Dear Martin,

An air traffic obstacle, a tall structure which can endanger air traffic, has to be marked with red and white colored markings and with aircraft warning lights at night. If you look at these communication towers this is how they are actually painted.

An airman say a pilot of a medicopter may well study terrain carefully on a map before a flight. In fact it is not a flight as a bird flies, but rather a jump as there is a time limit, an endurance. That is why a planning is necessary.

Unfortunately on the OSM map he/she will not see any icon. At the same time the air-traffic in urban areas will continue to increase. It is future of urban mobility [1].

If a helicopter, an RPAS, a plane touches a mast or a cable it would crash; a mast may collapse. For individuals involved it could certainly be a disaster.

People do realize it. Andy not only mapped the communication tower (or mast) but plans to map its cables. It is a good idea too. It will take time to map all these towers (masts), measure and calculate their height, etc.

Unfortunately the confusion between "man_made=tower" and "man_made=mast" continues. One is rendered and one is not, and that adds to confusion.

[1] http://www.airbusgroup.com/int/en/news-media/corporate-magazine/Forum-88/My-Kind-Of-Flyover.html

With best regards,

Oleksiy


_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to