"Dont tag for the rendered" Routers should make beaches routable even though theres no clear path. Same with indoor mapping: I'm not going to add a bunch of paths in something already tagged as a corridor/hallway
On Aug 29, 2017 6:54 AM, "Jean-Marc Liotier" <[email protected]> wrote: > Last week-end I went hiking along the coast from Honfleur to > Trouville-sur-Mer. As I wondered what distance I walked, I turned to > Openstreetmap routers... And did not find my answer: beaches are not > considered as highways. > > I thought about adding paths to beach sections that I consider > walkable... But, while some of those beaches have an identifiable path > along their length, for the most part this would be tagging for the > router. > > I fail to imagine a beach that is not walkable. So, should the routers > use natural=beach the same way as highway=path+surface=(sand|gravel|*) ? > > The question of routing across natural=beach brings back the past debate > about highway=pedestrian+area=yes - most routers do not route over > areas. > > I just dug this thread, which goes along the same lines as my reflexions > (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2014-July/013280.html) > but does no definitely concludes either. > > My conclusion is that I should open wishlist entries for my favorite > routers... Is it a good idea ? > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
