Hi, On 25.10.2017 08:09, Златовратский Павел wrote: > Well. That's the problem in your position: you point to specific > problems and ask to stop whole process.
Which "process" exactly are you talking about? There have been many processes mentioned in this discussion. > I met such behaviour with software implementation: people reject to use > software miss some feature even when software already do half of their job. "Half a good edit" is not good enough though. > I don't think any number of problems with automated edits is reason to > stop them. Automated edits need to be discussed in a suitable forum before they are executed, and must not be executed if there's significant opposition. An automated edit that affects only Russia may be sufficiently discussed on the .ru mailing list but one that is run in Latvia not. > Otherwise on next step we should ask to stop using of wikipedia links: > only name=* could be validated on the ground, there is no label on > object with wikipedia URL and 'guessed' wiki links sometimes became wrong. Well, certainly Wikipedia links should only be added by people who know something about the feature in question, and not by a machine that compares name tags to Wikipedia entries and takes a wild guess. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
