2017-11-13 20:52 GMT+01:00 Andy Townsend <[email protected]>: > On 13/11/2017 19:36, Yuri Astrakhan wrote: > > > That's why I think Sophox is a much better and safer alternative to > JOSM's autofixes. > > At the risk of repeating something that's been said multiple times > previously, with JOSM autofixes you're performing edits in an area where > you've already edited. You're presumably somewhat familiar with what's > there (you may even have actually visited in person and seen what it looks > like on the ground). >
The data one have edited is automatically validated before upload by JOSM validator, but you can also use it to validate and auto-fix any area you have downloaded, without any prior "manual" edits. It's a bit convoluted of a process, but it can be used like that to do mass edits. So comparing it to OSM Quick-fix seems valid to me, even if JOSM is our beloved editor.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
