I agree that Markus' solution is more elegant (and I was more looking to
the offramp itself). I would normally also map it like that but I also
don't go out of my way to correct situations like that.
The way it is mapped now is more organic, more as you would actually
drive. As such I don't see it as wrong.
I would not add a turn restriction. For routers it is useless because
you never get that route anyway.
Regards,
Maarten
On 2019-01-11 13:23, Jem wrote:
I'd map that place like that:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:ID_Screen_Shot_from_-32.0914374,_116.0129206.png
I agree. And a supplementary question... would you also add a
no-left-turn restriction from https://osm.org/way/581948344 at
https://osm.org/node/5680879176? I would, and have done in the past.
But to be honest, I'm not sure if a turn like that (having already
passed the slip lane designated for the turn) is legal or not.
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 20:47, Markus <selfishseaho...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 07:40, Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
On 2019-01-11 07:16, Petra Rajka - (p) wrote:
See below two cases where we would simplify the geometry:
* -32.0914374, 116.0129206
Is seen no big problem in how the roads are layed out there.
Coming from
the motorway there is a clear divider where the offramp connects
to the
Albany Highway.
<https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596272469> and
<https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596272466> form a
double-rectangle,
but there isn't such a divider. I'd map that place like that:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:ID_Screen_Shot_from_-32.0914374,_116.0129206.png
I have more problems with the tags of the on- and offramp. They
are
mapped as motorway when they should be mapped as motorway_link.
The two
bridges in the on- and offramp are mapped as motorway_link.
+1. I'd also delete the descriptions like Tonkin Highway Southbound
Ramp off to Albany Highway in the name tag unless the ramps are
signed
like that on site.
* -35.3409195, 149.1616891
Ways 77001149 and 77000891 should IMHO not be mapped like that but
mapped with turn:lanes.
+1
Regards
Markus
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
