On 2019-01-11 23:15, Warin wrote:
On 11/01/19 21:45, Markus wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 07:40, Maarten Deen <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2019-01-11 07:16, Petra Rajka - (p) wrote:
* -35.3409195, 149.1616891
Ways 77001149 and 77000891 should IMHO not be mapped like that but
mapped with turn:lanes.
+1
-1
I disagree. But then I could be wrong.
In the above (Canberra) example:
Where a solid line exists between the two groups of lanes there is a
'legal barrier' that you cannot legally cross between the two groups of
lanes (2 go right and 2 continues
But solid lines (single and double) used in the sense of "not allowed to
pass" or "not allowed to change lanes" are used everywhere over the
whole world.
I'm sure you're not suggesting that this [1] road should be mapped as
two seperate ways? Then why would we map other roads with no physical
divider as two seperate ways?
[1]
<https://www.google.nl/maps/@51.4313146,5.7421874,3a,75y,318.25h,88.15t/data=!3m5!1e1!3m3!1sYKLDgYrrbp4KJZFp1iqXsw!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DYKLDgYrrbp4KJZFp1iqXsw%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D15.575244%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100>
Also using the tag lanes how can the turn restrictions that exist be
tagged, the right 2 must turn right and the left 2 must go straight on
?
turn:lanes=right|right|straight|straight
Regards,
Maarten
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
