Can confirm roads, buildings, parks are from OSM from a little bit more than a year ago.
Not sure what the other sources contributed On Sun., Sep. 8, 2019, 6:17 a.m. Nuno Caldeira, < [email protected]> wrote: > > Here's another example of why we should not adopt the multiple sources > attribution omission of our attribution. They list us as partners (?) > https://www.wrld3d.com/3d-maps/custom-maps > Use multiple sources and are not complying with ODbL by not showing the > license. > Seen multiple maps by their clients and they show data "copyright l.map" > > I have confirmed with multiple contributors that largely the data used is > OSM and it's around a year old dump of the planet. > > Simon Poole <[email protected]> escreveu em sex, 9/08/2019 às 08:45 : > >> As we've mentioned multiple times over the last months, the LWG decided >> last year to consolidate all attribution guidance in to one document and >> address some of the use cases that have become common over the last 7 >> years that previously had none. Particularly in the light of the >> parallel discussions about attribution on larger social media platforms >> we need to make up our minds what we actually want, and define concrete >> minimum requirements for acceptable attribution. To not do this just >> provides the excuse of pointing to the cacophony of voices all saying >> something different. >> >> We've been working on and off on the document for a while, and are now >> largely finished. Going forward we intend to wikify the document and >> make it available for public comment together with a BoF session at SotM >> next month (which probably means that we'll have to appropriate a coffee >> break). You can have a glimpse at the text here >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e_IQYHtqVivGRw4O4EOn6__-LGMuzPlWz6XKEdAkwW0/edit?usp=sharing >> the few things that are not nailed down belong to those that we would >> appreciate feedback on. >> >> Simon >> >> PS: the number of coffee breaks permitting we might want to appropriate >> another one for the discussion of a tile licence change. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> osmf-talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk >> > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
