Hi all My 2cts : "in use" status and statuslink to the import proposal would be enough, right? Point is to determine where does the tag come from, and it's done by statuslink, not status which reflect the current state of use.
All the best François Le mar. 17 mars 2020 à 10:55, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On 17/3/20 8:22 pm, Marc M. wrote: > > Hello Joseph, > > it may give the impression that this is the way it should be done. > I agree to identify these "Noise" or poor quality tags, but with a > keyword to show that it's a problem. e.g. status=bad, disputed, error, ... > it would be necessary to find a word that is not as strong as error, > but which nevertheless clearly indicates that this is not an example to > follow. > > > > Agree with both. > > Possible values? > > obsolete > > abandoned > > discarded > > <https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaurus/forsaken> > > archaic > > passe > > stale > > > > <https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaurus/forsaken> > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
