Some other possible values:
undesirable
unnecessary
unwanted
unneeded
undiscussed
disapproved
clutter
However, among your examples you cite "gnis:feature_id=*" The wiki page
for this key notes:
"Unlike other imported tags such as gnis:created=* and
gnis:import_uuid=*, gnis:feature_id=* is meaningful beyond the import.
In fact, some mappers actively add gnis:feature_id=* to features to cite
a verifiable source for the POI's existence or its name."
But yes there are a lot of unnecessary gnis tags
gnis:County=*
gnis:County_num=*
gnis:ST_alpha=*
gnis:ST_num=*
On 3/17/2020 5:52 AM, Warin wrote:
On 17/3/20 8:22 pm, Marc M. wrote:
Hello Joseph,
it may give the impression that this is the way it should be done.
I agree to identify these "Noise" or poor quality tags, but with a
keyword to show that it's a problem. e.g. status=bad, disputed, error, ...
it would be necessary to find a word that is not as strong as error,
but which nevertheless clearly indicates that this is not an example to
follow.
Agree with both.
Possible values?
obsolete
abandoned
discarded
<https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaurus/forsaken>
archaic
passe
stale
<https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaurus/forsaken>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
